close dialogue

Hello smile

I'm Siobhan Curran/Kisa Naumova, and this is my weblog. I tend to write about stuff like crossdressing, Macs, code, cats, wine and Second Life, but in general it's just an ongoing conversation about all sorts of stuff. If you'd like to know a little bit more about what this all is, I recommend starting on this page which has a little bit of info on who I am, and what I'm trying to do — or you could dive into my five years worth of archives if you like.

Otherwise, feel free to close this box and explore...

Monday, 5th June, 2006

Studio Photography In Second Life

tagphotography secondlife howto

(Because that's what I'm interested in at the moment)

Just wanted to briefly come back to a question that Lana asked yesterday:

The SL ones look great without the background, how do you do that?

Well, like I said, I made myself a little studio in a skybox floating 100 metres above my house. Inside it, I made a (rather large) backdrop that I can change to any colour I want.

studio and backdrop

Essentially, it's 8 prims all carefully positioned so that there are no seams. When I was first building it, I had unusual shading going on on a couple of them, so I checked the "Full Bright" option (in the Edit -> Texture tab) which made it all uniform.

They're all linked together, so I can quickly change the colour if I want (like the grey in the 'James Bondesque' shot), and I'm thinking of maybe looking at using QuickTime VR images to bring Real World scenes into the photographs.

All I do is plonk myself down in the centre, make sure I'm facing the front, then position a couple of lights that I made...

posing with lights

...move the camera to where I want and hit the "Take Snapshot" key.

posing with lights

The trick is, I think, to use the camera controls very carefully — and also to use the "Zoom In/Out" keys (ctrl-8 and ctrl-0). Sometimes using just the alt-zoom camera control gives really weird perspective :wink:

Two little tricks/things/hints that I thought would be useful:

  1. In the Debug Menu, there's an option to take a "Hi-res Snapshot". You get stunning images that are just ripe for further play in Photoshop, but the files are around 80MB Bitmaps, so it takes a while.

  2. If you use a HUD attachment to control your avatar (I love mine :smile: Search for "HUDDLES"), then you need to hide it before you take the snapshot (View -> Show HUD Attachments), otherwise you'll get it in the picture. Or, if you're doing a Hi-res Snapshot, you'll get it repeated all over the place...

whoopsie

Finally, because I am an utter geek who likes to automate process and such, I knocked together a quick Automator action that you can attach to a folder so that whenever you take a snapshot, your Mac (sorry) resizes it, changes it to a JPEG, and imports it into iPhoto :biggrin:

Here's a zipped-up archive of it

You'll need an album in iPhoto called "Second Life" (although you could change the script to whatever), and it uses the Desktop as a temporary folder, so what I do is save all my snapshots in a folder called "Second Life" in my Pictures folder. Then every once in a while, I free-up Gigabytes of space by deleting the originals.

If there's call for it, I'll explain how I make vaguely-realistic looking film-grain in Photoshop as well.

Space To Describe Your Soul

tagphotography

While I'm in a 'photographic discourse' kinda mood...

Here's a little snippet from an email conversastion that I had with April favicon:

why is it that people feel compelled to leave quarter a frame empty at the top of photos? why why why?

Because that's specifically the part of the frame where you're supposed to reveal your soul
It took me ten minutes to type that. And a further ten to type this.
I'm very drunk

We were actually talking about this picture, but you see examples of it all over the Tranniesphere©

I think I know why it happens :smile: I think it's because we instinctively put our faces in the centre of the viewfinder, and therefore our bodies take up the bottom of the frame, leaving the top half blank.

The other (slightly related) thing that interests me about general 'snap-shots' is how our brains perceive a scene differently to a camera. You know if you look at something, your brain kinda shuts out a lot of the detail and detritus that's going on around. You still see it, but it becomes irrelevant and so you don't notice it.

The camera though, flattens everything and raises the level of significance of it all to the same level as the subject.

This is why radiators always appear in the background of trannie-photography :wink:

:biggrin:

That grin is a hyperlink by the way. I wasn't sure if it would be obvious and, er, it isn't. :smile:

you should used a png with transparency, or set the gif's white color = background/transparent...

(I did noticed.)

If you thought your Second Life studio was nifty, did you see this:

http://www.boingboing.net/2006/05/31/user_creates_virtual.html

(Yes, I know you don't like boingboing, but this gal takes her weirdness fix wherever she can get it! )

gravatar

Alli' Cat'

you should used a png with transparency, or set the gif's white color = background/transparent...

(1) Transparent PNGs no work in IE. (2) The GIF is set to transparent — it's the CSS on the link that makes it look odd.

Oops, I think I fell foul or your 'markdown' there. The address should read:

.../31/user[underscore]creates[underscore]virtual.html

with [underscore] replaced by "_".

gravatar

Alli' Cat'

Spotted — allow me to fix...

Thanks for that BTW — I must go visit :smile:

Have you seen the thing matt biddulph did for loading pics from flickr? You could use that for a background.

To make transparent PNGs work in IE use the AlphaImageLoader filter.

Aye — Tom favicon had mentioned it and posted a video.

I have a better way of avoiding PNG-problems in IE: Try and convince everyone to ditch it and use Firefox :tongue:

Just put a user agent check on your site that detects IE, then uses one of the many IE exploits to download and install firefox and set it as the default browser before they even know whats hit them!

You evil evil girl ... DO IT DO IT DO IT!

lol, I've got in trouble for things like that before. You do it!

I would, but I'm a bloody chicken :tongue:

Verbal Assault, Dada Style

tagrandom

Large groups of men scare the crap out of me, and so, whenever I'm walking around, if I see one I end to either (a) look at the ground, or (b) puff my chest up and try and look 'nonchalant'.

Even though many people have confirmed my deepest fear — that I look nothing like a girl most of the time — I have a strange self-deluded belief that my flowing locks and 'girly' ponytail somehow mark me out as being a "poof", and I therefore expect some sort of verbal barrage every time I sense danger.

Obviously, this only ever happens once in a blue moon, but it doesn't stop my paranoid head from digging down deep and donning a tinfoil hat.

Large groups of men standing around, or walking, then: scary things. Groups of cyclists, not so scary.

I mean, 'cmon. Most cyclists are ineffectual tree-hugging luddites who bang on about "organicness" and "senses of well-being" and "goodness to the environment" (despite the fact that global warming is entirely due to the outputs of cyclist's puffed-up, self-righteous smugness)¹, not marauding groups of tranny-bashers.

So when I saw a group of cyclists coming up from behind me as I walked along the path by the Castle earlier, my initial thought wasn't "crap — best adopt broad shouldered stance", it was "aw, bless. They must be really hot in those jumpers".

I've been insulted by kids on bikes before, obviously — the little shit that screamed "POOF!" in my ear one day, that was fun. But, as the guy on the bike at the front turned round to face me as he passsed, I certainly wasn't expecting this:

"Cuc-KAW!"

As his compadres and he chortled off into the distance, I was left there purplexed.

"Cuc-KAW?"

Was it some New World slang for "tranny"? Was it some kind of avian mating call? Was it just something in his throat?

Or, as I'm starting to believe, have I just had the glorious privilege of being insulted by André Breton on a bicycle?

¹ @NRT, I'm joking.

Maybe he was just stuttering as he tried to say "Cor!" As in "cor blimey"

Cuc-KAW

He was probably trying to lay an egg. Either that, or had just noticed his bike-seat had been stolen!

gravatar

Alli' Cat'

Nobody says Cor Blimey anymore do they?

gravatar

Jellied Eels

"Nobody says Cor Blimey anymore do they?"

Shuffles feet...

Well, in Oxford they seem to

I remember it quite clearly in fact — me, stood distraught at a phone booth, trying to get through to a Hickensian Legend to tell him that my mobile had been stolen...

When from behind the phone booth, I hear the words:

"Cor Blimey Guv"

And I knew I was in the right place :smile:

I Am Going To Bed

tagtime numbers random

But I'm going to set my alarm for early, because I want to be awake for 06.06.06 06:06:06. Because I am that sad :smile:

I mean, it's not like it'll be repeated soon or anything — it's not like there's a 07.07.07 07:07:07 (etc) looming in the nect year or anything...

11.11.11 11:11:11 is the one I'm holding out for. Personally :smile:

I'm looking forward to 10.11.12. 13:14:15 more:smile:, but I'm odd and pissed! I tried to spell "more" as "moore"

gravatar

Beki

Cuc-KAW -

was he sort of adopting a pseudo scottish accent at the time? If so this could be a quote from the irn-bru advert with the big orange aggressive cuckoo. I hope this is not the case because if it is, it probably means it's become a youth-phrase and we are going to have a summer of little turds answering perfectly normal questions with this and sniggering to each other as us old farts look askance.

Awesome watching you work in your SL studio, thank you :smile:

was he sort of adopting a pseudo scottish accent at the time?

Ah. Yes. Yes he was. :unsure: That would explain it.

BTW, 06.06.06 06:06:06 — a singularly uneventful moment in my life, notable only for the intense headache and wobbly body that comes with a hangover. Not the 'end of the world' as some had predicted.

why is it that people feel compelled to leave quarter a frame empty at the top of photos? why why why?

You fools. That's where the magazine masthead goes.

6 6 6.

The world hasn't ended then as the doom and gloom merchants predicted?

Gets out of bed and puts the kettle on

gravatar

Steph Jones

Most cyclists are ineffectual tree-hugging luddites who bang on about "organicness" and "senses of well-being" and "goodness to the environment" (despite the fact that global warming is entirely due to the outputs of cyclist's puffed-up, self-righteous smugness)

Yep. Quite right. Can't stand the buggers.

I ride a bike, but I'm not a 'cyclist'. :wink:

Meant to share this page with you, http://entropymine.com/jason/testbed/pngtrans/

Tests for PNG transparency on different platforms.

People are claiming the world will end tomorrow since ages, but personally, i believe the world ends next ednesday, just to be recreated the next thrusday with everything that was in it last wednesday.

Also, the Mayas said that in december 23, 2012, something like a world order change or some such will happen. So, that day I'm going to go out in the streets and cause mayhem, just because i'm bored.

It's December 21st 2012 isn't it? And it's known as "El Collapso".

Anyway, the world could've ended just as easily on June 6th, 1906 or 1806, too...

Well, if you consider that the new year used to be April 1, not January 1, then the 6th month would be September, and in that case 6/6/06 would also have a full moon. :smile:

or there's a friday the 13th in October if that sort of thing scares you. Actually a friend of mine is getting married on that date...

gravatar

Emily Grae