Hello 
I'm Siobhan Curran/Kisa Naumova, and this is my weblog. I tend to write about stuff like crossdressing, Macs, code, cats, wine and Second Life, but in general it's just an ongoing conversation about all sorts of stuff. If you'd like to know a little bit more about what this all is, I recommend starting on this page which has a little bit of info on who I am, and what I'm trying to do — or you could dive into my five years worth of archives if you like.
Otherwise, feel free to close this box and explore...
The Frustration Of (Non)Sharing
tranny fetish self sex sexuality crossdressing
Damm I looked good the other night. Seriously, you should've seen me.
Well, actually, no. You shouldn't've — or rather, I'd probably not've let you. Despite the slight bubblings to the surface of my more 'festishitic transvestism' recently — and me being more open about the kind of clothes I wear When I Want To Feel Horny™ — I'm still very reluctant to let that side of things 'air', so to speak.
I was wondering about this in the car this morning — just why is it that I'm driven to expose a very private thing in such a public forum? Why did I feel compelled to shove those two photos into this space, when the autoerotic side of my nature is usually something I'd rather not be bandied around?
What exactly did I want to get out of it? ![]()
There's a feeling I get, sometimes, looking at myself in the mirror — a feeling of frustration. And I couldn't help but draw a parallel between that feeling (just like the one I had last night) and the feeling I used to have five years ago when I first started posting pictures of myself dressed as a woman on teh intarweb.
I think it's got something to do with "validation".
I've written a lot over the years about the "self-delusional" powers of transvestites — how I in particular somehow manage to bend the face I see staring back at me from the mirror into "girl", even when the photographic record of the event contradicts this perception.
Granted, there's a lot to be said for the inability of (snapshot) photography to pick up on the nuances of a moment, and the film/CCD never sees the same as the eye — but I do believe there's a bit of perceptional hocus-pocus going on when I see myself in a mirror.
Perhaps it's the tendancy of the brain to focus on one particular aspect of the face, or ignore the tell-tale features of another aspect — or maybe it's that the brain wants to see "girl", so ignores "boy". Whichever/Whatever.
Sometimes — as I've said far too many times — I see a girl looking back at me.
And I think that part of the reason I find myself sticking pictures all over the place, is because I want that disperception validated by others. I want others to agree with me — sometimes, if I'm totally honest, regardless of how highly I regard their opinion¹.
It's not that I want lauded experts in gender facial features to give me a percentage rating of how well my ability to appear "not what I am" is functioning. It's just that I want someone, anyone perhaps, to agree with me, and tell me that they see it too.
I must confess that I find those two photographs of my self as discomforting as I do erotic — perhaps in the same way that I originally found the photographs of myself as Siobhan as discomforting as I did exciting. I'm more (I guess) uncomfortable with the Antisoftener² one as I am the other — not necessarily because I find it more erotic, just maybe because I'm more 'trussed up' in it — more verging on the 'pantomimic'.
...
The thing is though, I'm also wondering why the hell it is that I feel the need to blurt this out. I suppose part of it is a desire to say something along the lines of "You know, sometimes some of us do dress up for sexual reasons, and dammit, that's OK". But also, I think, there's a part of me that wants to admit my kinks with the same ease as my everyday crossdressing — and, more importantly, find some kind of outlet for that ... outside of my bedroom twanks³.
So I suppose, not only am I doing the same 'validation' thing as I do with my normal "girl" photos — only this time wanting to be validated on sexiness rather than gender illusions — I'm also yearning for the same physical outlet as I was when I was first trying to find places to go in a frock.
In an ideal world, I'd know of a club where I could go wearing whatever the hell I wanted to, and not feel uncomfortable.
But maybe, in the end, that's what we're all after.
(This is a Thought-Process In Progress™. Apologies for the incoherence)
...
(This is also a thought-process that has been occupying me for the past couple of days — hence the disjointedness too)
The thing is, while I was sat the other night — all dressed up — I couldn't help but think "Damm, I look hot". And even though there were the usual feelings of "but I can't let anyone else see me like this", I did actually start to wonder whether or not actually, ACTUALLY I didn't look that bad — and maybe what I was wearing wasn't something I could never go out in.
It wasn't outlandish, it was just, well, a bit quirky.
And I've been struck over the past few days, thinking about this, how bloody similar these feelings are to those I had five years ago — when I was getting all nervous and tentative about sharing a version of me online that previously had only been parading around the bedroom.
"Do I look OK?"
"Do I look stupid?"
"Will people laugh at me?"
"Do I look convincing enough?"
"Will anyone find me attractive?"
Granted, those questions are always at the back of my mind as my cursor hovers over the "Upload" button — but for this, something 'new and more personal', I felt myself right back at where I started. As if all the confidence I'd gained over five years of shameless photographic vanity-publishing had disappeared in a flash.
Sorry, I'm probably waffling a bit too much in circles here. It's just a really strange feeling.
What's equally strange, is the feeling of looking at yourself online, and realising that you've publically transformed yourself into the object of your own fantasies.
...
I don't really know where this is going, to be honest. Part of it is just a blatant "what'cha think?" tactic. Part of it is a serious plea for information about more 'extravagant' costume experiences.
But part of it is an attempt to fathom out why this compulsion exists for me, and whether or not it exists for others.
I'm also curious to know whether the same things that go on in my head when I look at photos like that of me goes on in others' heads.
...
Just one last thing, before I get too frustrated that none of this has come out the way I wanted it to, and pull it to shreds...
I've felt uncomfortable about broaching this subject — that of the intricacies of my sexuality — partly because I don't know if anyone cares, but also because of the more 'openess' of this blog. I do worry sometimes about the seeming randomness of all of this, but I worry in particular about how the disparate incomers from various segregated aspects of my life can often land on a page which has nothing to do with where they followed a link to me from (a tranny finding herself immersed in a Second Life tutorial, an academic suddenly awash with idle chitchat, or a friend suddenly surrounded with details of my smut).
Which is why I've kept going back to what Kim wrote a couple of months ago:
Mildly Diverting: Super Public, Super Sexy
In that stew of data on me, my sexual life is as weighted as my musical tastes, or my reading materials; it's all noise, just data points and only relevant if you want to make it so. Added together, though, it will probably tell you if I am someone you'd find entertaining to have a chat with in the pub.
I like that ![]()
¹ That sounds terrible, doesn't it? What I mean is that whilst on the one hand, there are certain commenters and observers on what I do whose opinions I hold in high regard, sometimes I question the 'validity' of one or two other opinions. But sometimes that doesn't matter — it's not always about feeling absolutely validated in a photograph — sometimes it's just nice to know that someone likes it, even if they're prone to leaving "Looking great!" comments on photographs that blatantly don't. If you get my drift.
² It's an anagram of tranniefesto. I'm presuming everyone guessed.
³ Look. I made a word up, and I'm going to use it, dammit.
Difficult isn't it?
Yes.
Cleo Roccos
I watched last night, and that's all ![]()
Dammit.. that 'me too' referred to the whole item, not just the last comment. That's what comes of trying to be smart.
It's interesting (to me at least) that you and I have ended up with different solutions to the same problem. You have integrated some of your 'other/real life' into your tranny presence on line, which makes it more natural, but hamstrings you when it comes to discussing the root of your tranny desires. I've kept myself determinedly anonymous online (as far as that's possible) so that I can parade around in silly costumes, but can't then share the complexities of combining a tranny life and real life into something sane.
Both of us want validation — ideally from people more fabulous, beautiful and rich than we are. But I'm not shallow, honest.
"In an ideal world, I'd know of a club where I could go wearing whatever the hell I wanted to, and not feel uncomfortable."
This statement was quickly followed by extremely loud coughing and shouting noises from somewhere in London.
Yeah I know its all a millon miles away (well more like 250 or so actually) but I think what you meant to say is that you'd know of a club close to home where you could go....etc... well heck — there has to be a vaudeville or burlesque scene in Leeds right? If not there probably will be soon — damm thing is getting soooo popular these days — and then you'll be able to wear whatever you like
I've kept myself determinedly anonymous online ... so that I can parade around in silly costumes
That would work better as an excuse for not blogging if there was a little more recent evidence on your site of the parading about in costumes, Claudia. ![]()
Wow, burlesque really is the answer to the world's problems.
If the world wants to parade around in silly costumes — then hell yes! — yer damm right it is!
ok — heres an attempt to moderate my usual mouthy comments.
Yes I am a fan. I love the whole circus party atmosphere and I can easily dive right in, swan about, make a right old fool of myself and generally snog, spank and snort my way around and about for 6 hours or so til the morning light starts to break and I.must.sleep.now.
But its hardly an environment for an interesting, in depth chat about stuff and things. And though I too may strike some people as "someone you'd find entertaining to have a chat with in the pub" (I live in hope) I'm in far too much of a state at the time to have a decent conversation with anyone. Either that or I'm much too busy making a spectacle of myself (and oh my — did I make a spectacle of myself last week). For which I now warn people of in advance if they plan on meeting me at one of these gigs.
So it really does depend what you want. If all you want to do is go somewhere wearing whatever the hell you wanted to, and not feel uncomfortable then these kinds of places are great. They're full of quirky mofos. But thats not it is? All this writing, all these words, all this talk of validation — what is this outlet you seek? Is it a place to go or is it a place where your head wants to be?
They're full of quirky mofos.
I'm not sure I'd agree with that. Based on (admittedly) only two nights out with you, I'd say there were a lot of "quirky mofos", but equally as many (if not more) who were just appropriating a 'uniform' in a very superficial way, without any engagement with its underlying structures.
...but that's just my cynical gripe against a post-postmodern, shallow youth ![]()
There was an advert on over Christmas (for Vodaphone or something — one of the mobile carriers anyway) that got my back up slightly along similar lines. A woman on the phone sees a child on some kind of rocking horse outside a shop, and is mentaly transported to some kind of funfair where glamorous people in extravagant costumes paraded around performing tricks for her and her friends' benefit.
...actually, sorry. That train of thought isn't going anywhere — it's too early in the morning and I haven't had enough coffee yet.
...
I think though, you're missing my point — probably because I hashed all that out without really planning what I was trying to say properly. It's not about feeling comfortable in the clothes, and wanting to be in an environment where that's "OK"...
You know how when we all go out to somewhere like Pink Punters? We get ourselves all made-up the best we can with the (perhaps) sole intent of saying "I've made myself look like this, because in these clothes, this make up, and with these mannerisms, they all make me feel feminine¹"
And the environment that exists within a club like that serves to 'cocoon' us from the harshness of reality, and our measure of 'success' is to some extent how much others agree with us: all the "You look great!"s — our self-image is confirmed by others.
So if you replace that "feminine" with "horny", I think that's what I'm driving at. The frustrations I have are centred around certain items of clothing and their combinations that, when I wear them, turn me into a horny little ball of easily-moulded putty — but more specifically, the lack of a 'space' in which to share that self-image, and have it confirmed by someone else's horniness.
I think, what I'm yearning for, is an environment/space where the shared acknowledgement is that the clothes that people are wearing isn't just because they're glamorous, or attractive, or convey a self-image that ins't easily presented outside of that environment — it's because those clothes actually turn you on. They're not 'accidentally' sexy, they're intentionally sexy.
...
Oh, I dunno ![]()
I'm almost certain I've got a point here somewhere — I'm just having a really hard time expressing it.
Sorry.
So it really does depend what you want
But of course. As usual ![]()
When I work out how to say it, I'll let you know.
¹ Yes, I know. Bad choice of words. I apologise
"I think, what I'm yearning for, is an environment/space where the shared acknowledgement is that the clothes that people are wearing isn't just because they're glamorous, or attractive, or convey a self-image that ins't easily presented outside of that environment — it's because those clothes actually turn you on."
www.tvchix.com ?
Mean't to add people may even vote for you. Is that getting anywhere near what you're looking for, if that isn't too stupid a question?
Mean't to add people may even vote for you
Nope, you've lost me there ![]()
I'm not entirely sure one should easily admit ones 'kinks'. At least, not in a "Hi, my names ... and I enjoy art, music, theatre and cracking one out while wearing wellies full of cold rice-pudding", kind of way. On the other hand, I'm not sure it does 'the community' any good to deny them: "No, no! I dress this way purely for artistic reasons and as an homage to Miss Munroe. My rather obvious stiffey is purely coincidental." I mean, Come ON!!! Who are we trying to kid?
What I don't get is:
"Damm, I look hot"..."but I can't let anyone else see me like this"
I mean, you've posted pictures that could be considered 'hot' before; so were these just too close to your own 'personal hot' or when you say "see", do you mean 'physically observe in the flesh'?
You see I knew that "Floating Seeds" was a bit of a 'thing' for you, you've written about it before; and when I commented 'nailed it', I was talking about the 'look' ('girl' dressed as 'boy'). But with "Antisoftener" (no, I didn't get the title) I just thought you were being playful and perhaps a bit flirtatious, and so totally didn't understand the angst that seemed to accompany it. All in all, my reaction to both of them was "it's Siobhan playing with being Siobhan", and would have been pretty much oblivious to any 'extra' significance if you hadn't chosen to bloody well explain it! ![]()
As for "disparate incomers"; well that's always been a problem, hasn't it? How many trannies have come here and found reams of stuff about Mac code or SL? In my opinion there isn't a way around it (short of segregating aspects of the 'stream', which I'm pretty sure you don't want to do, as it would go against the grain of an 'integrated whole'). I mean, isn't that part of the 'joy' of Tranniefesto? One day it's about PHP, the next S&S
After all, the sub-title "A Crossdressing Adventure" is a bit of a 'give away'!
As to "a place where...these clothes actually turn you on" Aren't you talking, broadly, about the 'fetish scene'? Now I know it's dominated (no pun intended) by leather, rubber, etc; but I'm wondering if there could be a trannie 'sub-culture', much like there is in the gay scene?
Incidentally, many moons ago, there was a monthly fetish 'bash' in Leeds that went by the name of "Mostly Harmless" (a mate of mine used to VJ there) and was sponsored by "Ritual" magazine. They produced some 'interesting' flyers, with photographs by people like Ben Westwood; and the "strict dress code" read "leather, rubber, uniforms, space age, cyberpunk, TV, glam, drag, lingerie, full evening dress, babelicious or bollock naked, no exceptions" (yes, I've still got some of them). I suspect it's now defunct
.
Anyway; interesting (as ever), thanks for sharing and, for the record, I also 'hold my hand up'.
It's an anagram of tranniefesto. I'm presuming everyone guessed.
Nope — I thought it was some Photoshop filter or effect you were mucking around with.
I can spot anagrams dead quick, when I know I'm looking for one — but I tend to take words at face value, otherwise. For example, I read just the other day that "Torchwood" is an anagram of "Doctor Who" — and that had never occurred to me. I read also that it was chalked on film cans during the filming of the first series of Doctor Who, to hide the reality of what was in (so they wouldn't be half-inched).
Which, I'm sure, is all terribly old news to the rabid afficionadoes... but was news to me.
Koan
while wearing wellies full of cold rice-pudding
You too eh? It has to be Ambrosia though, I find ![]()
were these just too close to your own 'personal hot'
Yup.
That's the thing about Antisoftener — on the surface it does just look like me "being playful and perhaps a bit flirtatious", but it was actually quite a difficult picture for me to decide to put up — being, as it is, more close to to my 'personal hot' than the other more 'general' tranny-shots I post.
I suppose that's what this post has all been about — the strange side-kick that the decision to post that has given me: the discrepency between the seeming 'playfulness' and the actual deeply personal 'revealing' hidden within it.
To flip back to the "it's a bit like transvestism" analogy for a moment, it's like being a tranny going to a fancy-dress party, and the awkwardness of trying to appear nonchalent conflicting with the desire to be 'out' — sorta.
Aren't you talking, broadly, about the 'fetish scene'?
I am, to be honest. I'm just not all that into leather/PVC/rubber — I guess I'm just wondering if there's a space within that scene for others ![]()
many moons ago, there was a monthly fetish 'bash' in Leeds that went by the name of "Mostly Harmless"
That reminds me, I need to do a fair bit of research into the tranny-scene in Leeds. I'm going to view a house on Tuesday...
I can spot anagrams dead quick, when I know I'm looking for one — but I tend to take words at face value, otherwise.
I got a great one of "transvestite" the other day: invert tastes
Ambrosia
Pervert!!!! ![]()
Just caught this and thought you might like it:
http://www.virtualaloft.com/
Hmm. Every time I read one of your posts like this I'm mentally screaming comments at the screen the whole way through. It's very cool actually, I love the way your site flows. But I digress. My point (which I'm going to as per phrase poorly), is that imho you're looking for what every girl (and possibly boy?) wants. Validation. You were born male, with a desire to look female. I was born fat(female), with a desire to look attractive(female). I too have a fetish for women in men's clothes. And a fetish for men in women's clothes. And a fetish for men, as women, in men's clothes. I empathise greatly with a lot of what you post. And to me that says that either I am a tranny, or these aren't tranny issues (I'm still undecided). Also, the point about a place where you can be these things comfortably, is less about the location, and more about the company I'd say. I don't care where I am, if I have the support of my friends around me, I can be whoever I want and act however I please. So maybe you just need to have a sleepover and dress up. If some are single and there's some wine, maybe you'll even get the horny validation you need.
But seriously, there are plenty of us who'd love to validate you. There's someone out there worthy I'm sure.
*aw* thanks Charlee ![]()
Hi Siobhan
I have been following your Crossdressing Adventure for a little while now, and I may now have the courage to post to your Trantastic site ![]()
I am working on reversing a 'Purge' decision I made some years back. Foolishly I thought I could live in denial of part of me, I am glad to say that I can see sense now. I just need to get a wardrobe to come out of, again!
In the intervening years though, I have sought something else that does also satisfy one of the 'needs' in me. Some acceptance (and validation I suppose, if I'm being honest), somewhere to 'be me'. I live in London and have experience of some of the 'fetish' clubs here. The first one I went to was www.torturegarden.com, I went as a bloke but in a rubber skirt and long boots. That was it, I was very nervous about what it would be like there, and what people would think or say. As soon as we got in the queue inside though, all my fears dissolved into the biggest grin I had had in years and a wave of peace and excitement. Everyone in there was at ease, wearing whatever, or not, they pleased, and enjoying the atmosphere that creates.
My experience was that it's not all about rubber/leather/PVC or whatever, it's about being free to be who you are, to feel how you want to feel, and to explore parts of yourself in a safe play place, and I really felt at home in that environment. I have not been in a while, however I believe that there is also now a large Burlesque contingent and I am very much looking forward to trying it out again when I am ready to step out of that wardrobe again as I know that fears of acceptance are not going to be an issue, and I will be able to look/feel how I want. I would also say the same of any of the fetish scene places I have frequented, and am sure that there are similar places around the country.
"I think, what I'm yearning for, is an environment/space where the shared acknowledgement is that the clothes that people are wearing isn't just because they're glamorous, or attractive, or convey a self-image that ins't easily presented outside of that environment — it's because those clothes actually turn you on. They're not 'accidentally' sexy, they're intentionally sexy." — (sorry, don't know how to do the quotie thing) —
I don't wear suits but I can understand how they might make a person feel sexy/powerful/whatever, rg's can wear clothes purely for the sexy/horny feelings they can evoke, and I am sure that they do it for their own pleasure purposes as much as 'pleasing their man' but that might just be my brains biased thought. So is there anything wrong in us doing it, and admitting it? No, I don't think there is. And there is space at the Fetish Inn for us and others, is what I was trying to say.
Anyway, I have taken enough of your space. Thanks for sharing so wonderfully about yourself, and good luck with your mission :x
Daryl
"I am, to be honest. I'm just not all that into leather/PVC/rubber — I guess I'm just wondering if there's a space within that scene for others"
A couple of fetish club websites I've seen have stated suitable dress would be leather, rubber, PVC... and trannie/crossdressing so I guess there's your "space within that scene" — don't think it's anything to be concerned about... except maybe in Lancaster. ![]()
BTW, sorry about the apostrophe in "Mean't to add people may even vote for you". What I meant was the tvchix site has the facility to vote for/rate members pics.
On the subject of house buying, here's a few things I wish I'd thought about / known when I bought mine:
If you're ok for cash, its too easy to buy-in to the 'suburban dream', but hold on a mo'. Do I want / need a garden? Will I enjoy maintaining it? Am I the slightest bit interested in it? In my case, the answer to all of these was 'no', but I still ended up with one and it pisses me off (ok, at the time there was a woman involved and I was all a bit 'misty eyed' — times change).
Don't buy a house on a corner. Look, just don't! Corners are bad. They are meeting / departure points for groups of people at all hours of the day and night. How many times have you shared a noisy 'black' cab and said, "Just drop me on the corner..."?
Houses near schools are bad. The more affluent the area / better the school, the worse they are. You think you hate 4x4s now...
How convenient is it for work / play / the rest of the world? Easy access to the rest of the world is good, but if the rest of the world uses your street to get from 'where it is now' to 'where it wants to be' — it's bad.
How far is the nearest 'take-away emporium'? Easy walking distance can be good; but if it's 'average take-away consumption' distance then it's bad (guess where the wrappers are going to end up?)
But don't let me 'bring you down'. It's probably just that the pressure in my spleen had built up and I needed to 'vent'.... Yep, feel a whole lot better now. Happy house-hunting
.
The first one I went to was www.torturegarden.com
Thanks for that Daryl ![]()
I must admit, I'm really in the dark when it comes to fetish clubs. I'd thought maybe I should give one a go — but it's names like "Torture Garden" that have always put me off in the past ![]()
And there is space at the Fetish Inn for us and others, is what I was trying to say.
I like that ![]()
Like a Travelodge, but more fun.
/me shudders and giggles at the thought of torture garden. My high priest was gonna take me there when I was a young goth (14). But he and his wife (the priestess) kept giggling about me going in nowt but blood bags, him almost naked on a leash and her in her leather catsuit. It kinda freaked me out. They also told me tales of pits where people just had orgies with strangers. I'm sure it was all over exagerated, but I never quite got up the guts to go there. I did though have a rather lovely time in the intrepid fox. So many beautiful goths there, and just round the corner is gaytown supreme. Dear god I'm sure they hire the waiters on how cute their arses are!



Me too.... for what it's worth.
Difficult isn't it?
P.S. Cleo Roccos, mmmmmmm.