Hello 
I'm Siobhan Curran/Kisa Naumova, and this is my weblog. I tend to write about stuff like crossdressing, Macs, code, cats, wine and Second Life, but in general it's just an ongoing conversation about all sorts of stuff. If you'd like to know a little bit more about what this all is, I recommend starting on this page which has a little bit of info on who I am, and what I'm trying to do — or you could dive into my five years worth of archives if you like.
Otherwise, feel free to close this box and explore...
Twittervision
It's like a huge global conversation, randomly interrupted by David Hasselhof — I could watch it for hours, but I've got too much to do today...
A Minor Apology
I can't help but feel, sometimes, that the content of my blog slips away into the random and uniteresting. As much as I love the Fluidity Of The Now™ that seems to underly it, it does bother me when that 'Now' descends into tiny fragments of interest.
Real-world distractions, mountains of work, household chores and the like, often pull my attention away from the things that I want to be doing — writing/talking about stuff like the seperation of self from the avatar/girl because of 'voice', overhauling screeds of code to Make Life Easier™, fluffing around the living-room in petticoats — that sort of thing.
Today, I will mostly be doing laundry, processing a mountain of CDs, stocking up te fridge, and fretting that I've become very boring of late.
Just very quickly though: a momentary snapshot of my state of mind...
Woke up with a grin on my face. Feel very good about things in general. All these things I'm involved with — the things that are pulling me away from writing coherently about stuff — (like the book for example, although that's not really taking up time any more, I just wanted to pimp it again) are on the one hand very exciting, and on the other very scarey. I had a little moment of self-doubt last night, surrounded by some spectacular work by a whole bunch of SL Scripters. My little contribution seemed rather pathetic in comparison, but I pulled myself together quite quickly.
I dunno — head's all over the place at the moment. Sorry ![]()
...
As an aside, I was just wondering if anyone reads my source code ever? And if anyone had noticed things going on in it recently...
Remains of the Day
"Open box. Squeeze"
Open box. Remove metallic bax and tap. Cut a corner of bag. Pour.
Never boring or uninteresting. And random, I like ![]()
Some Getting Used To
photo kisa secondlife neko skin
I've had the same skin for about 18 months now. It's done me well in that time, but recently I've been seeing so many better-shaded ones around. I've been trying demos on left, right and centre, but so far the only one that's come close to how I see myself is this one (Aria Doll Lashes — or something like that — from Naughty Designs)
Still not entirely sure though. It's funny how changing skins can totally alter your facial structure, and I guess it takes a while to settle into one
That's pretty cool.
Has the new skin changed your lip colour, or are you trying a new shade (been watching too many Mabelline ad's)?
Yeah, it's a lot lighter. There was a darker one — 'blackberry' I think — butI thought I'd try light for a change.
Hmm. "Change" — an idea I should apply to my RL make-up, rather than relying on black eyeshadow all the time... ![]()
Have you kept a record of Kisas evolution?
Not as detailed a one as I'd like to have, although there are some early photos in my stream of me without a skin at all — just the default freckles.
But, I've never deleted my AVs from my inventory — just created new folders. So I could do something using them.
(It's funny, sometimes, jumping back into the original AV that I walked off Orientation Island wearing, and scaring the crap out of people)
I do look at it sometimes, not sure why, but I do. It's uploading your Twitter(?) comments, in the source but not main blog... ![]()
As an aside, I was just wondering if anyone reads my source code ever? And if anyone had noticed things going on in it recently...
Sometimes...you said you'd integrated twitter, but I never thought to check the source. Nice way to do it!
Sarah Perkins
Thanks
It kinda makes sense to me — having a little widget somewhere here wouldn't have fitted in to the 'flow'. And I know it might seem a bit daft to have them as comments, but I like the idea of a 'backchannel' — so to speak — they provide a little bit of contextualisation, a snapshot of what's going on, without barging their way obtrusively into the main body.
Relying on black eye make and variants round that have been good enough for me for the last 20 years.
Whats the point of putting the stuff on if you aren't hoping to make some form of impact?
Indeed — impact is everything ![]()
Speaking Of Widgets
(Which I was) I just wondered if anyone else got an email like this from someone trying to promote something called "AutoRoll"...?
Hi Siobhan,
From what I read, your blog seems to cover a lot of interesting topics around your original and personal vision on everyday's life. Your blog is quite visible (I found you in the first results of Technorati), so I guess you must receive loads of messages.
Hmm
It goes on to rave about this new thing, and suggests I install it in my sidebar — which makes me doubtful whether he actually looked at my blog (and, considering the 'I found you in the first results of Technorati', I doubt it even more — I'm 64,290th, which although I feel isn't bad, it's hardly the "first page").
Me not actually having a sidebar, and all ![]()
Whatever. It all read like a stock email, masquerading as flattery — and, if anyone had noticed, I'm not prone to taking what appears to be bot-generated flattery very well.
personal vision on everyday's life
WTF does that mean, anyway?
...
It was the last line that narked me though:
I hate those stupid spams as much as you
Yes, well, let me see — random email out of the blue trying to sell me something. That counts as spam to me
Vocal Dischords
Apologies for the directionless rambling. I guess I talk the same way that I write — sidetracking all over the place, and eventually forgetting the plot. But hey. To be honest, I wouldn't sit down and watch this — the video is really just me flapping my hands about. I'd have it on in the background while doing the dishes or something...
It's about 80MB, I'll warn you now. Oh, and it kinda trails off rather weirdly at the end ![]()
Anyway, I think I gave up on the idea of writing/talking 'fixed ideas' a long time ago, so I wouldn't watch that expecting some kind of 'perfectly-formed' viewpoint — just some trannie talking to herself and trying to work out what she thinks about things ![]()
I left some stuff out that was in my head earlier — like a bit of a chuckle at some of the more affected feminine voices I've heard trannies using over the years. But you can't have everything...
Here's the link I mention near the start BTW — Cala: The Crisis of Voice. Even though my own personal experience of being 'TG' in SL doesn't exactly correlate to those she quotes, I find it fascinating — and a real eye-opener — all the same.
It's "funny", I find it uncomfortable sitting and listening to you. It's not anything you're saying, or how you're saying it. And it's certainly not because I have any "mental image" of how you sound.
It's just... strange and vaguely unsettling. I dunno why.
Is that my point though — that even though everyone knows what I sound like, to interject that into this space 'breaks the fourth wall' and shatters the suspension of disbelief?
I mean, you obviously know what I sound like — we've talked over the phone, face to face, and even Super Modern Video Link-Up Type Things loads of times — but in this context (and, by extension, in other contexts like SL where I re-present myself in similarly text-based ways) it just feels wrong?
Hmm...
You're making me think, I'm just not ready to have an opinion yet.
My take on the whole "voice in SL" thing, without having read all the available comment, is that it might be a case of doing something because it's possible, not because it's really desired. They're trying to do something with a technology that hasn't matured to the level needed to fit the ethos of Second Life — the idea that it's a completely separate online identity.
If I could customise how my voice sounded in SL to the n
I'm probably making tired points that are being made better elsewhere.
doing something because it's possible
As opposed to doing something because it's interesting — agreed ![]()
If I could customise how my voice sounded in SL to the n
th degree, in the same way as the rest of the avatar is customisable, then the technology would be fit for purpose.
I wonder about that though. As I said, Even if other people could hear me the way I thought I should sound, I couldn't — which is (perhaps) one of the most important things (for me). It's how I see/hear/imagine myself that gives me that mental 'hook' into that space — not the re-perception of others.
(Although that might be bollocks — how people see me obviously feeds back into how I see myself)
You're making me think
A fair trade-off I feel. You're making me try and think of hilariously witty comebacks to this — which I am so going to fail to do tonight, but it's going to bug me all day tomorrow ![]()
I guess if you really wanted to 'customise' your voice, you could patch one of those 'pitch shifter' do-dads between the mic' and the pc (hell, I'm sure there's probably a tiny chunk of software that'll do it). Trouble is, you'll probably end up sounding like a bit of a Dalek (thinking about it; more like a bit of a dip-stick
)
(Ok so I started writing this while waiting for the vid' to download; might have known you'd already be on to it
)
I don't have a problem hearing your voice in 'this' space. I guess we all 'play nice' and interact with each other using whatever gender they choose to present as; but intellectually 'I know', so maybe that's why your voice doesn't 'jar'. I mean: I've "Read The F'ing Manual" ![]()
SL, I think, is different. I don't think people meet, for the first time, and check out each others profile (which could be fairly pointless — what's to say it's truthful?) No; SL's a cartoon-like medium and because of that people will use visual clues to form impressions (although, thinking about it, would they get as upset to discover that "X" isn't really a unicorn / gryphon / ravenous bug-blatter beast of Trall? I think not). Bottom line: If your SL is the same as your RL, is there any fucking point to it?
Personally, if they can make 'voice' work, I think it will catch on. If only because it stops all that, frankly ludicrous, 'air keyboard' thing.
Interesting that your own (Skype?) experiments with voice resulted in a 'disconnect' though 8-S
Finally: Did we really need video? Its not like you drew diagrams, it took an age to load, and most of the time I was just watching the odd pixel on your ceiling change shade! Nice to hear your voice though.
(Yea' I know you warned us; but I'm one of those people who sees the big red button marked 'Do Not Press' and...
)
Am I the only one getting video without sound then?





"Gaze not into the abyss, lest the abyss gazeth also into you"
- F Nietzsche, Beyond Good & Evil